New Jersey and Florida account for almost half of the 50 U.S. counties whose housing markets are most vulnerable to the economic effects of the coronavirus, an Attom Data Solutions report said.
Attom ranked 483 counties across the country based on the percentage of housing units receiving a foreclosure notice in the fourth quarter, the number of underwater properties in each county and the percentage of local wages required to pay for major homeownership expenses.
Thirty-six of the top 50 most vulnerable counties had median home prices in the $160,000-to-$300,000 range, the report noted.
Of the 10 most vulnerable counties, six are in New Jersey, including Sussex at No. 1 and Warren at No. 2.
"It looks like the Northeast is more at risk than other areas," Todd Teta, Attom's chief product officer, said in a press release. "As we head into the spring home buying season, the next few months will reveal how severe the impact will be."
Among the New Jersey counties that would be most affected, five are in the New York metropolitan area: Bergen, Essex, Passaic, Middlesex and Union. However, of the four counties in New York that Attom considered to be most vulnerable, only Rockland was in proximity to New York City.
Rajeev Khanna is the chief information officer at Trucordia. He is a seasoned executive leader with over three decades of experience in insurance and other industries, directing global technological operations, product development, and infrastructure management. He balances strategic thinking with innovation and hands-on execution, leveraging his deep understanding of how technology can unlock value in the insurance industry. His expertise spans e-commerce, banking, technology, and professional services. With a passion for building effective and sustainable teams, Khanna has fostered collaborative environments while managing globally dispersed operations through his leadership and top talent mentorship.
Mark Rems is a principal and national leader of the KPMG Indirect Tax Technology practice. Based in Philadelphia, he has roughly 25 years of tax and technology experience helping clients improve their indirect tax function. He has led large global tax engine implementation projects for a variety of ERP systems including SAP, Oracle, and MS Dynamics. He also has extensive experience in programming and application development which includes developing custom integrations and standalone programs to assist clients with their indirect tax calculation and reporting processes. He has deep sales and use tax compliance experience and has helped clients centralize and automate their monthly compliance function. He has direct experience working in a number of niche tax technical areas such as motor fuels, excise taxes, telecom taxes and lease taxes.
Amit Ringshia is a principal in KPMG's New York Ignition office. He focuses on the design and delivery of technology solutions and has more than 16 years of experience delivering tax technology driven transformations. He is focused on innovating solutions in areas of tax data management, tax process automation and integration, tax analytics, digital labor and tax department collaboration. He is responsible for assisting in technical aspects of projects including solution design, development, infrastructure, governance models, management and migration. He has architected solutions that integrate multiple tax technologies with company technologies to optimize efficiencies for an effective tax function. He leads teams with experience in software development and tax domain. He supports engagements by leveraging his technology and tax experience with project execution and delivery expertise. He has assisted engagement teams and their clients to enhance the utilization of technology in data collection, processing, analysis and reporting. In addition, he has delivered tax technology solutions that span the breath of tax department functions such as planning, compliance, transfer pricing, audits and provisioning for both direct and indirect tax functions. He is an active member of various tax and technology groups in New York City and is a regular speaker at various tax and technology conferences. He also organizes innovative technology sessions and trainings for tax professionals.
For New York City proper, all five boroughs were in the middle of the list: Staten Island was ranked 161, Queens was 271, Manhattan at 312, Brooklyn at 320 and the Bronx was 327.
Most of the Florida counties considered at risk are in the northern and central portions of the state. But Broward County, which includes Fort Lauderdale, is also on that list.
There were four counties in the metro Chicago area on the list were Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will in Illinois. Cook County, which includes Chicago proper, is ranked 53rd most vulnerable.
Meanwhile, the only California county on the 50 most vulnerable list is Shasta. Los Angeles County was No. 276. The Bay Area counties were also in the bottom half of the list.
At the other end of the spectrum, 10 of the counties where the housing market is least vulnerable to the coronavirus are in Texas. Seven are in Wisconsin and there are five in Colorado.
King County in Washington, where Seattle is located, was the 20th least vulnerable county according to Attom.
