Transfer pricing changes drive tax savings for coronavirus-impacted companies

Intercompany pricing corrections now can help generate cash by utilizing tax net operating losses.

In a pandemic environment, longstanding transfer pricing policies can lead to suboptimal tax results. Multinationals that incur losses in some locations while earning generous profits in others could be overpaying taxes. For many companies, modifications to intercompany pricing that reduce taxes payable and utilize losses are overlooked tax savings opportunities.

A multinational company's transfer prices of goods, royalties, services and loans affect where profits are generated, or the losses incurred in each country. For companies impacted by COVID-19, an assessment of estimated taxes payable and losses by country can highlight tax savings opportunities.

CORONAVIRUS IMPACT: ADDITIONAL COVERAGE
Lowell Smith chief compliance officer and co-founder of IRALOGIX
Lowell Smith Jr.

Lowell M. Smith Jr. is chief compliance officer and co-founder of IRALOGIX.

His previous experience includes working for the ERISA enforcement agency in the U.S. Department of Labor. He created a TPA compliance practice and consulted on products, procedures and technology for clients of Universal Pensions, now Ascensus. He is a published author and a frequent speaker at industry conferences.

Paul Tyler

Paul Tyler is Head of Enterprise Marketing and Marketing Innovation at Zinnia, previously serving as CMO at Nassau Financial Group where he led branding strategy, digital initiatives, and built direct-to-consumer channels for insurance products. With deep expertise in financial services marketing and digital transformation, Paul brings a practical perspective on how advisory firms can leverage technology to enhance client engagement while maintaining the human connection that's essential in financial services.

Gordon Gray is the executive director of the Pinpoint Policy Institute. Prior to launching Pinpoint, Gordon served as the vice president for economic policy at the American Action Forum, where his portfolio included the federal budget, taxes, the macroeconomic outlook and general economic policy matters.

For many cross-border businesses, well-established policies have facilitated the pricing of intercompany goods, royalties, and services transactions over many years. However, even the most robust transfer pricing policies were not designed for pandemic-driven closures. As a result, multinational companies have a high global effective tax rate even when incurring company-wide losses. Paying unnecessary income tax bills is particularly painful for those companies already short on cash.

Tangible tax savings

An example may best illustrate the potential for savings from revisiting transfer pricing policies in the wake of the pandemic. In this situation, a wholly owned manufacturer relies on a sizeable cost-plus margin policy when selling inventory to the parent company.

For a subsidiary in a 30 percent tax rate jurisdiction, a $2 million reduction in transfer prices leads to $600,000 in tax savings by utilizing tax-inefficient parent company losses. Corrections to royalty rates and service fees have similar impacts. The result is the same: utilizing tax net operating losses in Country A while reducing Country B’s taxes. That being said, there does need to be economic substance to justify these changes.

Advertisement

Implementing tax savings

transfer-pricing-example-diagram.jpg

Utilizing tax NOLs in Country A while paying fewer income taxes in Country B is, at first glance, a straightforward concept. However, implementing corrections to transfer pricing often requires some planning. In my experience, senior management on both sides of the border needs to be involved in the decision-making process. Other issues, such as adjustments to Customs entries, are additional complications. Transfer pricing documentation is often well-advised support for changes to transfer prices.

Tax auditors may have questions about why transfer prices have changed. COVID-19 has transformed the global business environment, but preparing support to quantify the pandemic's impact on a company is advisable. Furthermore, making modifications before year-end is less complicated than afterward.

Now more than ever, multinational companies should consider modifications to transfer prices when assessing their global effective tax rate; however, changes to cross-border taxes need to be explained. While there are some complications, cash and tax savings can be well worth the effort.

More Thought Leadership

In this market, everyone wants leads to turn into sales even faster. But smart companies know that when spending slows, establishing a relationship is even more important than in boom times—and know that investing in content .

B2B marketers must consider intent data as a tool to grow their pipeline.

Learn about the strategies, promotional assets and trends that are proving most effective